This pamphlet is a contribution to the debate over how we organise and campaign to save the NHS. It has been produced by the International Socialist Network and is available to download and distribute.
Banner at the Block the bridge action |
What
will it take to save the NHS? Almost all avenues have been tried in
one way or another. This pamphlet attempts to advance a strategy for
uniting the different forces involved in NHS campaigns into a
movement which can mobilize the great mass of NHS staff and our
patients, the public, in the mass social movement that is needed to
halt the programme of cuts and privatisation dismantling the NHS. It
does not focus on the attacks, by successive Tory and Labour
governments, but rather the response of unions, professional bodies
and grassroots activists.
Nothing
about the destruction of the NHS is inevitable. The NHS is one of the
largest organisations on the planet, and the largest healthcare
organisation in the world. It employs 1.2 million people directly,
and an estimated 6 million indirectly. Its dismantling is a long term
political project which has taken over 30 years.
The
process, started under Thatcher and maintained by Labour, has now
been brought to its final heightened frenzy by the Tory-Liberal
coalition. It has been driven by the needs of the market, had its way
greased with lobbyist money, and enabled by politicians and political
parties having abandoned principles in favour of corporate careers
and the revolving door between ministerial posts and the private
sector. They have enabled a massive transfer of wealth from the
public to the private sector, at the price of massive suffering for
patients, their families and staff.
The
attacks on the NHS have been resisted, but nothing has been able to
halt them. Partly this is due to the determination of government and
their corporate health backers, but has also been assisted by
compliance and collusion from those organisations which are tasked
with protecting and improving the NHS for its workers and the public.
The NHS under Labour
When
Labour was elected they pumped huge amounts of funding into the NHS,
rescuing it from the decades of underfunding under the previous Tory
government. They also committed to funnelling large chunks of this
money to the private sector through allowing the commissioning of
services by the NHS, and instruments like the Private Finance
Initiative (PFI). The private healthcare market, which was tiny at
the turn of the century, was given much needed support and funds in
the form of lucrative contracts for NHS work.
The
NHS budget was increased, but rather than increasing NHS capacity,
independent
sector treatment centres
(ISTCs) were contracted to reduce NHS waiting lists. Private
companies began to cherry pick “easy” operations and function as
parasites on the NHS budget, absorbing huge sums for work that was
incomplete,
poorly
done
and even dangerous.
Nevertheless the funds grew the private sector and set them up for
taking over larger
contracts in the future.
During this time there was a revolving door between the Department of
Health (DH) and the private sector as health ministers and DH
bureaucrats moved between government positions and private healthcare
companies or management consultants.
During
the 13 years of the Labour government, pro-Labour trade union
officials sat on every attempt to organise resistance to Labour's
privatisations. Where action was organised, it was limited,
tokenistic and ineffectual. An example of this is the case of NHS
Logistics. This highly profitable department
was contracted
out to DHL
with only
two
days
of strike action
organised by UNISON, barely a week before the contract with DHL was
due to start. The last minute action, without any attempt to mobilise
the public or other sections of the NHS workforce failed. It was
emblematic of much of the union leadership’s response to NHS cuts
and privatisation. Last minute, disorganised and tokenistic actions,
which inevitably ended in defeat and demoralisations.
PFI; bleeding the NHS dry, and the hypocrisy at the heart of austerity. The one thing that will never be cut is the PFI debt. (Private Eye) |
Those health worker activists at the grassroots levels who organised effective action to stop cuts and privatisation were marginalized and bullied when they attempted to stand up to Labour policy, and where they wouldn't back down or shut up were witchhunted out of their unions and their jobs. Union militants were forced out, and entire branches smashed up in order to allow Labour government policy to be enforced.
Campaigns like “NHS Together” and “Keep the NHS working” were launched by the union leaderships, claiming to unite all the health unions in opposition to growing commercialisation in the NHS. But these were top down, bureaucratically controlled campaigns. Union members had no say in how these campaigns were run, and were just wheeled out for rallies and meetings occasionally. Neither NHS Together nor Keep the NHS working never organised any concrete action to oppose Labour's policies. When the union leaderships couldn't contain anger at cut backs any longer, as in the 2006-2007 period when 20,000 NHS workers lost their jobs, they organised a toothless demonstration in November 2007 of just 7,000 people under the depoliticised slogan “I <3 NHS”. The demonstration served to blow off steam for the workforce but didn't challenge government policy.
Due
to its continued agitation about Labour's detrimental policy towards
the NHS, Keep Our NHS Public was unofficially made a proscribed
organisation by UNISON's leadership, and branches were told they
could not organise events with KONP, affiliate to it or donate money
to it. In 2009 a motion went to UNISON conference to overturn this
unofficial rule and was passed, but UNISON nationally still does not
sponsor KONP, although individual branches can and do support them.
The
end result was that, even though under Labour there was widespread
opposition to NHS privatisation in the general public and among NHS
staff, this was never able to cohere into a national movement which
could stop or reverse Labour's policies. The process Labour started
was to be accelerated under the Tories, til we faced the prospect of
the destruction of the entire NHS as we knew it. Unfortunately
despite Labour being out of power, the same inaction, corruption and
political compromise plagued the unions under the Tory-Liberal
government.
References:
- Kings Fund Briefing, “Independent Sector Treatment Centres” October 2009
- A Pollock, G Kirkwood, “Independent sector treatment centres: the first independent evaluation, a Scottish case study” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2009
- Thompsons Solicitors, 2012, The hidden cost of independent sector treatment centres
- W Wallace, “Independent sector treatment centres: how the NHS is left to pick up the pieces” British Medical Journal March 2006
- UNISON Bargaining Support Centre, “Private sector in NHS health care” August 2005 via Keep Our NHS Public
- Socialist Worker “NHS Logistic Strike Ballot” 12 August 2006
- BBC “NHS Staff out in national strike” 22 September 2006
- BBC “Union finalises second NHS strike” 18 September 2006
- MedicalHarm “Karen Reissman and Manchester Mental Health” July 2011
- Socialist Worker “Union betrays UCLH hospitals strikers” 3 April 1999
- Socialist Worker “Leading defenders of NHS under attack” 5 Feb 2000
- Socialist Worker “Yunus Baksh: The fighter who refused to go down” 6 November 2012
- Wikipedia “NHS Together”
- BBC “NHS staff protest against reforms” 3 November 2007
The
NHS under the Tories
The
methods utilised under Labour to ensure acquiescence to government
policy were used again under the Tories. Despite the worst attack on
NHS funding, the 20% budget cut nicknamed the “Nicholson
Challenge”, and legislation designed to dismantle the entire NHS,
not a single national demonstration has been organised in the NHS
defence.
Although
Andrew Lansley presented his White Paper “Equity and Excellence:
Liberating the NHS” in June 2010. Little opposition was organised to it
initially.
In
September 2010 UNISON produced a pamphlet, “More
than just a brand”
which accurately laid out the effect the white paper would have on
the NHS. UNISON then mounted a legal
challenge
to the White Paper in October 2010. When that
failed
UNISON did little further. UNISON produced a leaflet after the Health and Social Care (HASC) Bill
passed titled "How
UNISON changed the Health and Social Care Bill", which serves as
the unions account of its campaign against the bill.
It is largely a series of media campaigns, and lobbying of party
conferences, with “victories” from these campaigns such as “there
will be a longer transition for hospitals becoming foundation trusts;
separate accounts are announced for private and NHS income.”
None
of the core of the Bill was affected by UNISON's actions. Throughout
the 18 months of the bill’s passage, no attempts were made to
mobilize members or organise protests on the streets or at NHS
hospitals against the bill. This is despite the fact that one third
of the NHS workforce, 437,000 people, are UNISON members and are
directly affected by the reforms.
The
leaderships of the RCN and BMA both adopted a policy of critical
engagement with the government rather than opposing the Health and Social Care Bill.
The
BMA did this for a mixture of conservatism and naked material
interest; their members in the private sector and in some GP
practices stood to benefit immensely from being given responsibility
for allocating NHS funding. Doctors and other health workers
repeatedly lobbied the BMA to change their stance. Eventually BMA
members managed at their annual conference in June 2011 to change BMA
policy to call for withdrawal of the Bill, but the BMA leadership
under Hamish Meldrum continued to engage with the government against
the democratically agreed policy of the BMA membership. The BMA
Council finally adopted a policy of full opposition to the Bill in
November 2011 when the full reality of the effects of the bill were
revealed to GPs, but the BMA leadership refused to implement this and
no campaign was organised.
The
RCN engaged with the bill from a sectional standpoint; believing that
they could influence the bill and obtain a better deal for nurses and
more say in how the NHS was run by participating in the process.
Although the RCN passed a motion
of no confidence in Andrew Lansley
at their national Congress in April 2011, this measure was done at
the expense of more political motions which would have committed the
RCN to outright opposition to the HASC Bill. Through they engaged
with the bill, nurses ended up with next
to nothing.
The RCN eventually came out against
the bill in January 2012,
but it was too little too late.
Unite
supported several demonstrations organised
by grassroots campaigns
against
the HASC bill,
and has shown a willingness to back struggles like the Save Lewisham
Hospital Campaign. However it has used its status as a "minority"
union in the NHS (despite being the largest union in the UK) as an
excuse for not trying to spearhead the defence of the NHS when all
other unions capitulated. Its strategy at present is to support
community campaigns to defend services, but UNITE has shied away from
using its organised membership to oppose government policy through
protests and strike action.
The
Trade Union Congress finally organised a rally
against the HASC Bill on March 7th
2012. The rally was indoors in Westminster Central Hall, with a
maximum capacity of 2000, a carefully managed array
of speakers,
and no plan of action for the weeks and months after the rally. The
leaders of all the main health unions who had barely lifted a finger
in the previous 24 months to stop the HASC Bill, all paraded on stage
to issue loud denunciations of the government and expressed their
commitment to defending the NHS. Their real contempt for grassroots
activists was shown when the doors of Westminster Central Hall were
closed in the face of 500
students who had marched down to the rally
from their universities. The last thing the union leaders wanted was
anyone attending who might have demanded they actually act to stop
the destruction of the NHS.
The
bill was eventually passed into law on 1st
April. UNISON held a minutes
silence
outside of parliament to protest the passing of the bill.
References:
- UNISON “More than just a brand” September 2010, via Socialist Health Association
- BBC “Union challenges NHS 'shake up' 24 August 2010
- Dave Prentis “The case for the NHS” 13 October 2013, The Guardian
- Ehealth Insider “UNISON legal challenge rejected” 19 October 2010
- UNISON “How UNISON changed the Health and Social Care Bill” April 2012
- The Independent “Nurses pass vote of no confidence in Lansley” 13 April 2012
- RCN “Royal College of Nursing Health and Social Care Bill briefing to the House of Lords (Report Stage)” RCN Briefing February 2012
- RCN “Why the RCN is opposing the Health and Social Care Bill” RCN Briefing January 2012
- Right to Work “Day X for the NHS – 1,000 march through the City of London” 10 March 2011
- TUC “All together for the NHS”
- TUC Youtube“Rally To Save Our NHS”
Organising from below
As
union after union has reneged on its responsibility to protect the
NHS, activists have taken it upon themselves to do so.
In
2011 myself and other health activists formed the Healthworker
Network to coordinate opposition among NHS workers to the Bill and
the effects of the 20% budget cuts. We organised demonstrations
and protests
in London
to rally NHS staff and students against the bill and try and pressure
the unions into action.
NHS
workers formed the National
Health Action Party
to organise and give expression to their desire to defend the NHS on
the electoral field.
The Block the Bill action mobilised 2,000 people to block Westminster Bridge |
UK
Uncut called days
of action
against the cuts to the NHS. They called for and organised the Block
the Bridge action
where 2,000
people came from around the country
to symbolically block
Westminster Bridge
and stop the passage of the bill.
Whistleblowers
let down by the health unions unwilling to stand up to management and
expose the cover ups and victimizations which plague the NHS formed
Patients
First
to support each other and campaign for whistleblowers' rights and the
protection of patients in the NHS.
Gloucester
Keep Our NHS Public combined public campaigning with a legal
challenge which went all the way to the High Court, to successfully
stop
the transfer of community services and 8 community hospitals to a
social enterprise. The decision at the High Court forced the Primary
Care Trust to create a new NHS Trust for the services, and
campaigners created a
guide for how others could replicate their victory.
Nurses
formed the 4:1
Campaign
to pressure the government to introduce mandatory minimum staffing
levels for the NHS to safeguard patients and staff.
Keep
Our NHS Public
has tirelessly campaigned to defend the NHS, organising protests and
leading many smaller local campaigns to defend hospitals and
services. They organised a march of 8,000
people through central London
in May 2013.
The
Save
Lewisham Hospital campaign
was founded and lead by the community and local health workers, with
almost no support from the local UNISON hospital branch. They mobilised 25,000 people to march in defence of their hospital. The
leadership of the UNISON branch denounced activists leafleting the
hospital and publicly criticised the campaign to all hospital staff.
Mothers
opposed to the destruction of the NHS have launched the 999
call for the NHS campaign
which is organising a march
from Jarrow to London
in protest at the attacks on the NHS. The march is being organised in
the spirit of the 1936 “Jarrow Crusade”, a march by unemployed
workers from Jarrow to London in protest at the conditions they were
made to endure during the Great Depression.
Mental
health service users in Cambridge occupied
the Lifeworks clinic
for four months and eventually stopped
its closure
at the hands of the local NHS management.
While
no union has organised coordinated resistance to the cuts, individual
branches have taken action themselves. They have often been supported
but left isolated. Admin workers in UNISON at Mid-Yorkshire NHS trust
waged a hard battle against down banding, but UNISON refused to
generalise the fight or bring out other branches in support, despite
down banding happening right across the NHS.
UNITE members strike for patient safety in Yorkshire Ambulance Service |
The
Unite Yorkshire Ambulance Service has a long
running dispute
against cuts, shift changes and de-recognition. The strike action has
been strong, but the UNISON ambulance branch at YAS refused to come
out in support, and told
its members to keep working,
undermining the dispute. The UNITE branch went out again in
July.
Many
NHS pathology labs are coming under increasing pressure from cuts and
privatisation. Labs at my hospital have been privatised, and have had
to be bailed
out by the trust
due to inefficiency and mismanagement. Recently Northampton Hospital
has locked
out a group of pathology workers
who refused to sign no-strike contracts. This follows other
long
running disputes
at other
path labs
in Chorley, Leeds, Wigan, Salford and Reading. Despite these attacks
taking place almost everywhere, UNITE is not trying to coordinate a
national campaign to protect pathology services in the NHS.
GMB
branches have lead many strong local campaigns in defence of cleaning
staff, and lead a strong campaign against racist bullying at Swindon
Hospital by private contractor Carillion.
GMB members strike and protest against racist bullying in Swindon |
Doncaster
Care workers are currently fighting against huge cuts to their pay,
and have had several weeks of continuous strike action, levels of
action almost unheard of in the care sector.
Despite
the wholesale destruction of the NHS, there has still been no
national demonstration in its defence. The TUC eventually called for
a demonstration in September 2013 in Manchester. This was termed a
national demo, but it wasn't in London and was only targeting the
Tory Party conference, not Parliament and the Department of Health.
No action by healthworkers was planned to try and put pressure on the
government after this show of opposition to government policy.
References
- Right to Work “Day X for the NHS – 1,000 march through the City of London” 10 March 2011
- Indymedia “Kill Lansleys Bill - NHS protest Tues 17 May, Gower Street, London, 5.30pm”
- National Health Action Party www.nhap.org
- “Anticuts groups descend on banks in NHS protest” The Guardian 28 May 2011
- UK Uncut “Press release: UK Uncut to shut down Westminster Bridge in protest over NHS bill” 21 September 2011
- The Guardian “Protestors against NHS reforms occupy Westminster Bridge” 9 October 2011
- UK Uncut “Block the Bridge, Block the Bill” 21 September 2011
- Patients First www.patientsfirst.org.uk
- False Economy Blog “How Gloucestershire Campaigners stopped NHS privatisation” 12 November 2012
- False Economy Blog “A glimmer of hope: we can stop the privatisation of the NHS” 1 May 2012
- False Economy Blog “Keep our NHS Public Gloucestershire campaign guides” 1 May 2012
- 4:1 Campaign for Mandatory Minimum Staffing Levels http://4to1.org.uk
- Keep Our NHS Public www.keepournhspublic.com
- Occupy London “Defend London's NHS Demonstration 18 May”
- Save Lewisham Hospital Campaign www.savelewishamhospital.com
- 999 Call for the NHS www.999callforthenhs.org.uk
- 999 Call for the NHS “The peoples march for the NHS”
- OpenDemocracy/OurNHS “Patients occupy threatened mental health clinic, some signs of victory?” 23 April 2014
- Cambridge News “Mental health drop-in centre Lifeworks saved from closure after four-month sit-in by Cambridge patients” 28 june 2014
- Press Association “Ambulance staff strike in care row” 2 April 2013
- NHS Fightback “Yorkshire: Unions sabotage strike by ambulance staff” 9 April 2013
- ITV “Yorkshire ambulance staff to walk out in Grand Depart week” 4 July 2014
- The Guardian “NHS lab failings follow SERCO-led takeover” 30 September 2012
- Lancashire Telegraph “Chorley Hospital staff in threat to strike” 20 April 2013
- Yorkshire Evening Post “Leeds Pathology Workers Strike Threat” 1 July 2013
- Wigan Today “Strike is avoided” 1 March 2013
- World Socialist Website “UK: Unite union imposes Salford NHS Trust’s attacks on workers” 3 June 2013
- Union News “Managers make pathologists' blood boil over patient safety” 27 March 2014
NHS Employers on the offensive
NHS
Employers, seeing the inaction and unpreparedness of the unions, have
not sat idly by. In May 2012 16 NHS trusts formed the South-West
Pay Cartel.
They openly argued for breaking away from national pay bargaining
organised through the Agenda for Change pay scale, and imposing
regional pay agreements on NHS workers in the South-West.
While
regional pay deals have been raised
repeatedly by governments and health ministers
as “the answer” to the supposed inability of the government to
afford the NHS, this was the first time that trusts had lead the way
in trying to implement
a regional pay deal.
They
met stiff
resistance
from local unions, with 27,000
people signed a petition against the pay cartel,
and everyone from local trade NHS union branches to the South-West
TUC coming out against the proposals. Rallies and protests were held
outside hospitals across the South-West, and a march organised by NHS
union branches drew over
1400 NHS workers to Bristol.
Local protests and lobbying knocked
Trusts
out of the Pay Cartel one
by one,
reducing it from 20, to 13
till eventually it dissolved in April
2013.
UNISON members in the South-West protest the Pay Cartel |
Its
purpose had been fulfilled by then though. With the South-West Pay
Cartel in existence, NHS Employers leant heavily on NHS unions
throughout 2012 to accept changes to Agenda for Change at the
national level, with the threat that if they didn't, other trusts
inspired by the South-West Pay Cartel would be let off the leash.
Staff were already facing severe attacks, with North
Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
threatening to sack all 5,500 staff and remploy them on new contracts
if they did not agree to changes.
Rather
than call their bluff and organise to fight as the union branches in
the South-West had done, the RCN
and
UNISON
accepted
this concession bargaining and signed up to revisions to Agenda for
Change in January
and February 2013.
Both
RCN
and UNISON
claim they agreed to give these concessions in exchange for
maintaining national pay bargaining. But these concessions involved
an agreement to implement performance related pay, a divisive
measures which hands more power to management to discipline the
workforce, and they include the loss of out of hours sick pay, and
loss of pay increases for newly qualified nurses. And the agreement
does nothing to prevent employers trying
the same tactic again.
UNISON
states its reason for agreeing to the concessions, that it was “in
response to a number of NHS trusts attempting to ‘break away’
from the national agenda for change agreement.”
UNISON
continues “Members in these trusts had to organise, campaign and
take industrial action to try and stop the employers reducing terms
and conditions and moving to local contracts.”
Given that this is exactly what a union is supposed to do when its members are attacked, and its members were already doing this in the South-West, it should have been possible for UNISON to role out this action across the NHS in response to the employers threats. Campaigning could have improved morale, defended tems and conditions and been a chance to organise and politicise the workforce.
Given that this is exactly what a union is supposed to do when its members are attacked, and its members were already doing this in the South-West, it should have been possible for UNISON to role out this action across the NHS in response to the employers threats. Campaigning could have improved morale, defended tems and conditions and been a chance to organise and politicise the workforce.
UNISON's reason for not doing so was a “consultation” they held with branches over their willingness to take action to defend Agenda for Change. This “consultation” never went beyond branch committee level in most branches, and its result were never released to the branch committees or the wider membership. We were never able to judge whether members were willing to fight, and were not even balloted over whether we would be wiling to fight. The democratic method would have been to ballot members over their willingness to take action. Being democratic has never been high on UNISON's leaderships priorities.
Even if members weren't up for a fight, and they had already shown their willing to fight in the South-West, its the role of the union leadership to lead, not just sit meekly by and accept their members pay and conditions being trashed, forcing them into poverty. allowing the undermining of NHS' ability to recruit and retain staff and forcing the burden of austerity onto NHS staff and patients.
References
- Nursing Times “South West Trusts set up regional 'pay cartel'” 25 May 2012
- The Guardian “NHS Employers warn George Osborne against imposing local pay rates” 22 March 2012
- Skwawkbox Blog “THE 28 MEASURES THE SOUTH-WEST PAY CARTEL IS CONSIDERING AGAINST STAFF” 12 September 2012
- BBC News Cornwall “Unions angry at health consortium's ideas for South West” 23 August 2012
- HM Government E-petition “No to postcode pay” http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/36063
- Express & Echo “Protest against NHS Pay Cartel deepens” 6 December 2012
- BBC News Dorset “NHS hospitals trust leaves South West pay consortium” 13 November 2012
- Blackmorevale Magazine “Health unions jubilant as Dorset County Hospital trust quits pay ‘cartel’” 16 March 2013
- UNISON South-West “South West Pay cartel Now Down to Thirteen Trusts” 5 April 2013
- British Medical Association “Regional Pay Consortium disbands” 18 April 2013
- The Mirror “5,500 could face axe at just ONE NHS Trust if they don't sign new pay deal” 5 October 2012
- Royal College of Nursing “RCN COUNCIL DECIDES ON AFC PROPOSALS, FOLLOWING CONSULTATION” 23 January 2013
- Nursing Times “Unison accepts Agenda for Change proposals” 6 February 2013
- Health Service Journal “Unison accepts Agenda for Change proposals” 6 February
- UNISON “Defending Agenda for Change”
- Nursing Times “Trusts desire fresh Squeeze on Agenda for Change” 3 June 2013
The NHS will only be saved by massive social protest
Labour's
Shadow Health Minister Andy Burnham has promised to repeal the Health
and Social Care Act, but promises are cheap, and we've heard plenty
before. Labour still have to win the election, and how they can
repeal the bill, stop privatisation and still meet Tory spending
plans is not clear. Repealing the bill will mean cancelling contracts
for the services privatized. Unless Labour commits to cancelling them
without compensation (which I would support, but the private health
corporations would not) this will be a costly exercise which will eat
up the NHS budget. Much like the promises to renationalise the
railways pre-1997, I expect these words to not amount to much.
Instead
we need to look
to Spain
where massive
protests
by healthworkers and the public, and strikes
by hospital workers
halted
plans to
privatize the health system.
Strikes
and protests by NHS staff and communities can terrify politicians,
and scare off private companies looking to make a quick buck on the
NHS. The last thing these private companies want is a workforce that
will stand up to their greed and attempts to gouge profit from the
NHS by intensifying work, slashing staff and rationing care.
The
forces are there, what the situation needs is a group of radical
healthworkers and community activists with the connections and social
weight to initiate a campaign and draw the great mass of supportive
but inactive NHS workers and patients into it.
The
grassroots organisations exist which could lay the basis for a
national staff and community lead campaign to defend the NHS. Keep
Our NHS Public has dozens of local groups, there are several local
Save A&E campaigns, the most well-known being the Save
Lewisham Hospital Campaign.
Alongside this is the growing Save
Our Surgeries
campaign of East London GPs, and the National
Health Action Party
which has thousands of healthworkers as members. There is also
Medsin,
the radical student medical society, with hundreds of members in
universities around the country. As well there are many union
branches who have resisted NHS cuts, like Mid
Yorks Hospital
fighting downbanding, Yorkshire
Ambulance Service,
GMB
Carillion
standing up to racist
bullying
and Brighton
GMB
opposing cuts by Kershaw, the Trust Special Administrator who tried
to close Lewisham Hospital.
Organising
a national coalition of these forces to defend the NHS could begin to
assemble the critical mass of activists and organisations which is
needed to mobilise enough people to defend the NHS, and start to
develop the organisation in the NHS workforce that must exist for the
sorts of strikes and direct action needed to cripple the government’s
plans.
Save Lewisham Hospital: Mass community opposition to hospital closures |
Several
opportunities have already been missed to construct such a campaign.
As the HASC Bill went through parliament in 2011, the grassroots
activists who spearheaded the campaign against the Bill could have
organised themselves into a national campaign aimed at coordinating
action and providing a lead for all the tens of thousands of people
opposed to the Bill, but who were left disorganised by the health
unions do-nothing or openly collaborationist approach. This was not
done, and following the calling off of the national public sector
strike against pensions, in January 2012, the movement was
demobilised, demoralised and petered out.
As
the A&E crisis grew through 2012-2013, the government proceeded
to
target A&Es
up
and
down
the country for closure and the Save Lewisham Hospital Campaign
received national press coverage, a national Save A&E campaign
could have been launched to unite all the local campaigns into a
national movement to halt the governments closure programme. This
could have overcome the unevenness between the campaigns, given a
national perspective and coverage to the issue, and forced the health
unions to act on the issue, rather than leaving the campaigns
isolated as supposed “local” issues, when they were the result of
national
government
policy.
Unfortunately this did not happen. The Labour Party played a
pernicious role in this respect, opposing attempts in local
campaigns, primarily Lewisham, to link up with other campaigns and
raise the issue to a national level. This would have forced the
Labour Party nationally to openly oppose government policy, which
they were unwilling to do, so local Labour Party activists did what
they could to keep campaigns localised.
Millwall players warm up in Save Lewisham Hospital campaign t-shirts. Opposition to NHS cuts is widespread and popular, but remains a "local" issue. |
Labour
activists have made clear their opposition to anyone trying to oppose
them on NHS policy, or trying to build an organisation independent of
their control. This article
by a Labour activist argues that the NHS Action Party should be
“strangled
at birth”
as they may take votes away from “the
only truly NHS party – the Labour Party”.
It’s
not the fault of NHAP or other campaigners that Labour may lose votes
or support to other parties. It’s the fault of Labour's policies
during their time in office, and the fact that many of us having
memories longer than a few months. Labour needs to come out
wholeheartedly against the government's plans for the NHS, and help,
rather than hinder, attempts to construct organised opposition to it.
Until they do, voters and activists have every right to look
elsewhere and support other groups who have maintained a principled
opposition to all attacks on the NHS.
A
conference called Reclaiming the NHS was eventually organised in June
2012 to oppose the government’s attacks. This was called by the NHS
Support Federation, a trade union supported organisation which
carries out research on reforms to the NHS and opposes cuts and
privatisations. The possibility of uniting
the different campaigns was discussed
prior to the conference, but the conference itself was not
organised to do so.
There were mostly top table heavy sessions with academics,
journalists and union leaders giving their thoughts on the NHS
reforms, with no forums for discussing and democratically deciding
how to unite all the different campaigns into a working coalition.
Workshops were held on different areas of campaigning, but these just
reported to the main conference, and no decisions or votes were taken
on any matters. The conference was a talking shop, which produced
little in the way of action.
Given
the future we face if the reforms continue unopposed, it’s an
absolute necessity that grassroots activists in the health service
and communities affected try and unite their various campaigns into a
national movement to save the NHS. The unions have abdicated their
responsibility to do this, Labour are largely opposed to doing so, so
it’s up to us to do it ourselves.
Why
aren't we choosing one Saturday a month and designating it an NHS
action day and targeting the banks and corporations involved in NHS
privatisation?
If
no one feels they have the authority to call actions (what authority
did UK Uncut have? It just did it!) , let's create an authority that
does by combining all the different campaigns into a national save
the NHS campaign, under the democratic control of NHS workers,
patients and communities.
Such
a campaign could overcome the conservatism and bureaucratic inertia
of the unions, and force the NHS onto the political agenda in an
active way, forcing politicians and parties to take our demands
seriously, and cease treating the NHS as a chance for political point
scoring while behind the scenes they do deals to hand it over to
their private sector donors.
We
have spent 4 years fighting the reforms as a fragmented mess of local
campaigns and individuals. Its time we united our forces into the
mass social movement that the NHS needs and deserves. Anything less
will not do, and we will continue to lose important battles, and the
state of the NHS will deteriorate to the point we can no longer
mobilise people in its defence. Once this happens then it will be the
end, but it’s not happening yet, so if we act now, we can still
save the NHS.
If
we organise a conference to launch a Save the NHS campaign in the
autumn, we can begin to coordinate action in the run up to the
election. We could set a NHS day of action each month to keep up the
pressure on the government, and galvanise more widespread action and
coverage.
We
could launch a monthly bulletin for NHS staff, informing them what is
happening and how they can fight cuts and privatisation in the
workplace. Ignorance of the effects of the reforms and a fatalistic
belief that nothing can be done lies heavily on the NHS workforce. A
source of knowledge and grassroots networks of staff committed to
fighting and organising direct action in the workplace could begin to
turn this around.
We
could call a national Save the NHS demo for the Spring and ensure the
election is all about the NHS, so the Tories definitely lose.
And
we can set the groundwork among NHS workers, community campaigners
and NHS activists to ensure what whoever wins the 2015 election, we
have a strong united movement capable of defending the NHS against
further attacks.
The NHS: Still the best health system despite 4 years of austerity and government attacks (Commonwealth Fund) |
References
- Portside “Spanish doctors and nurses protest privatisation” 17 February 2013
- Bloomberg “Madrid Hospital Privatization Frozen Amid Legal Challenge” 12 September 2013
- BBC “Mid Yorkshire NHS Trust staff union vote for new strike” 29 May 2013
- BBC “Further strike action in Yorkshire Ambulance Service dispute” 17 May 2014
- Labournet “Swindon hospital strike against Carillion” 28 February 2012
- Union News “Blacklisting scandal widens with link to “racist bullying” hospital dispute” 12 March 2012
- Nurse Boothroyd Blog “Brighton Defend the NHS Demo” 7 April 2013
- The Telegraph “NHS opens door on widespread A&E closures” 18 Jan 2013
- BBC “London A&E closure plan published” 21 June 2012
- The Telegraph “Mass closure of NHS walk-in centres fueling A&E crisis” 10 November 2013
- Labourlist “The National Health Action Party must be strangled at birth” 18 October 2012
- Red Pepper “Reclaiming our NHS” 22 June 2012
- NHS Support Rederation “How to reclaim our NHS”
Epilogue: What kind of NHS do we want?
What
sort of NHS we want is a crucial question, because what we want the
NHS to become determines what we are prepared to do to defend it, and
how we go about that.
Most
supporters of the NHS are in favour of a publicly owned, universally
accessible and free at the point of use NHS, funded by general
taxation. This is what the NHS was at its inception, and the
socialist principles it embodied have imprinted themselves on our
consciousness. The vast majority of people in Britain strongly oppose
the idea that people can or should be made to pay for healthcare, and
instead view it as a right.
Millions
understand the NHS as a massive progressive gain, which should never
be allowed to be rolled back. However the NHS was not without faults.
Created in a capitalist society, it was subject to the problems of
hierarchy and exploitation which are central to that system.
While
providing excellent treatment to many, its unaccountable bureaucracy
was party to a great many cover-ups and scandals, and many NHS
workers sacrificed their livelihoods and careers to blow the whistle
on dangerous practices, corruption or incompetent practitioners.
Patients suffered devastating medical errors, and lacked control and
autonomy within the system, and despite recent government rhetoric,
still have little say in how the NHS functions.
While
massively more efficient than any market mechanism, the NHS
bureaucracy still committed errors, and its plans and allocation of
resources was distorted by governments political priorities, the
influence of the medical hierarchy, and for many years, too little
input from patients and service users.
The
NHS still operates in a parasitic way on many countries health
systems. Chronic underfunding of nursing schools, and a constant
shortage of doctors forced the NHS to recruit staff overseas,
effectively stealing highly trained professionals from the poor
nations who had done the costly work of training them. This has
robbed those nations of staff they desperately need, while allowing
successive British governments to reduce training budgets and close
nursing schools in Britain.
Bearing these issues in mind, is it enough to want to go back to the way the NHS was, with all these faults? Shouldn't we be projecting a vision of an NHS fit for the 21st century, taking the best bits of the NHS from the 20th century; its socialist universalism, healthcare as a right, free to access with the cost borne by the whole of society, and combine that with best of the 21st century rejection of hierarchy and authoritarianism, respect for the individual and their autonomy, and a grassroots, democratic approach to organising and providing healthcare.
Bearing these issues in mind, is it enough to want to go back to the way the NHS was, with all these faults? Shouldn't we be projecting a vision of an NHS fit for the 21st century, taking the best bits of the NHS from the 20th century; its socialist universalism, healthcare as a right, free to access with the cost borne by the whole of society, and combine that with best of the 21st century rejection of hierarchy and authoritarianism, respect for the individual and their autonomy, and a grassroots, democratic approach to organising and providing healthcare.
A democratically controlled NHS, with budgets under the control of NHS staff and patients, with elections for all managerial positions, and with representation at all levels for patients and local communities, would create a truly accountable and open health system.
An egalitarian NHS with a greatly reduced hierarchy, which acknowledges the collective nature of all healthcare work, and values the work of all NHS workers, from cleaners and porters up to clinical nurse specialist and neurosurgeons, and gives them all an equal say in how it is run.
Nationalising
the pharmaceutical and medical science companies and incorporating
them into the NHS in order to eliminate costly interactions with the
private sector which drain the NHS budget. With pharmaceutical and
technological development incorporated into it, the NHS could become
the centre of advancement for medical science, able to develop and
share its discoveries and knowledge internationally without recourse
to the profit motive and its distorting and exclusionary effects.
Re-nationalising
the care home system, and properly integrating health and social care
so the NHS once again provides care from cradle to grave, providing
well resourced and staffed nursing homes for older people with
properly trained NHS staff, where older people can receive the
support they need to lead dignified and stimulating lives, free from
the poverty and social isolation that at present affects millions of
them.
Making the struggle for the NHS part of a struggle for a new social system which seeks to eliminate the causes of illness, not just the symptoms; working to eradicate poverty, inequality, exploitation, hierarchy and guarantee everyone housing, education, fulfilling work and plenty of leisure time.
This is a vision of an NHS worth fighting for, and one which we can create, if we organise to make it so.
Making the struggle for the NHS part of a struggle for a new social system which seeks to eliminate the causes of illness, not just the symptoms; working to eradicate poverty, inequality, exploitation, hierarchy and guarantee everyone housing, education, fulfilling work and plenty of leisure time.
This is a vision of an NHS worth fighting for, and one which we can create, if we organise to make it so.
No comments:
Post a Comment