It appears that Sharon Graham’s leadership is failing to support the Chair of the Health RISC of London and Eastern Region, Mark Dunne. Mark Dunne, a mental health nurse of 25 years service, has been subject to a targeted and hostile redundancy by East London Foundation Trust which removed him from post in July.
Mark Dunne has been Unite Branch Secretary and Staff Side Chair of East London Foundation Trust (ELFT) for ten years. He has been a leading figure in Unite in Health and has been responsible for driving forwards an organising and campaigning agenda in the London & Eastern Region. Mark drove the ballot for ELFT to come out on strike in the pay dispute in 2022/23, and has driven work to develop, coordinate and organise health branches across London & Eastern, where he was elected RISC Chair in 2025. He has been a loud voice against the cuts imposed on mental health services, and was in the process of organising a campaign against the £25 million pound cuts planned for ELFT this year.
As a result, Mark has been targeted by his Trust leadership who deleted Mark’s job despite the position still being needed. Mark still had 12 months left on his term of office as Staff side Chair when he was removed from post, and the Trust denied him the request to see out his term. He was terminated on 29th July despite several protests from ELFT Branch. This is a clear case of a leading NHS trade union representative being victimised for their activism.
Silence from Unite
Shamefully, there has been no publicity from Unite nationally about Marks trade union victimisation, and no organised leverage campaign has been started to defend Mark or stand up for basic trade union principles. No press release or statement has been issued by Unite or the Unite Executive despite it being repeatedly requested by Mark and other ELFT reps. It has been four months since Mark was issued his redundancy notice, and a month since his termination, so there has been ample time for these to be issued. Sharon Graham supporters elected to the Unite Exec from London and Eastern Region have been approached and requested to make the case for more publicity for Mark, but so far no change has been forthcoming from the Unite leadership.
The shameful silence from Unite’s leadership leaves you wondering about the commitment from Sharon Graham and her supporters to be fighting for a militant union. To not publicise the targeted sacking of a leading trade unionist in the NHS is criminal and has deprived Mark of public support right when he needs it most. ELFT branch have held three protests at ELFT HQ over Mark's sacking, and are preparing to ballot over the cuts and Mark’s termination, but there has been zero national publicity from Unite.
The branch and has managed to secure publicity in national newspapers like the Guardian and on BBC radio, but this has all been driven by the branch and Mark, not the national Union or Unite Executive. When Sharon Graham gave comment to the Guardian about the issues at EFLT, she referenced the cuts, but not Mark's termination.
Mark has stood for election to the Unite Executive on the Members United slate, so it is difficult not to conclude that that this failure to support a leading union rep and RISC Chair is due to factional reasons. At a time when the NHS is in deep crisis and NHS trade unionists willing to lead a fight are extremely thin on the ground, to allow one to be sacked without a serious public campaign defies belief. There are real concerns now that Sharon Graham supporters in Unite will try and leave Mark's issue off ELFT's strike ballot, depriving Mark of further support.
In other cases of trade union victimisation, Unite and Sharon Graham have stood very publicly against it.
Unite has set its own standard
Sharon Graham has repeatedly taken a strong position against trade union victimisation.
When Unite rep Pete Randle faced victimisation, Sharon Graham said: “Unite will not allow Pete to be victimised for carrying out his trade union duties” and pledged to “continue to do whatever is necessary in defence of our rep.”
As recently as January 2026, when two Unite reps were dismissed at the International Transport Workers’ Federation, Unite demanded their immediate reinstatement, promised its “complete support”, launched a strike ballot and pledged to escalate the dispute.
As a minimum the above should have been done for Mark already. A ballot is being prepared, but while the cuts at ELFT have received national press coverage and this has referenced Mark’s sacking, this coverage was not due to Unite. How much more coverage could this issue have if Unite publicly threw its weight behind Mark’s case?
Every Unite representative should receive the same protection and solidarity, regardless of political views, internal alignment or position within the union. Reps must be free to debate and disagree while knowing that when an employer attacks them for their trade union activity, their union will stand behind them.
That principle only means something if it is applied equally.
Unite and Sharon Graham must publicly reaffirm their full support for Mark; provide the necessary regional, national and media resources; support continued campaigning and demonstrations; pursue an appropriate remedy with ELFT; and give this case the same determination shown when other Unite reps have faced victimisation, like the Murphy 4, or more recently workers in Legal 500 or Food Service Logistics.
This is not a request for special treatment. It is a demand for equal treatment.
An injury to one is an injury to all.


